Submit an IdeaBuilder Sign In
AGI Futures
AGI Futures
ClimateScienceClimateSocial Trust

Carbon Dioxide Removal MRV Standards

Carbon dioxide removal is increasingly required in net-zero pathways, but the market lacks trusted measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV), so buyers cannot confidently differentiate real tons from stories.

Priority68
Importance82
Neglected35
Tractability55

The Gap

What exists is a patchwork of protocols, registries, and claims that are hard to compare and easy to game. What could exist is MRV that is standardized, auditable, and composable: transparent uncertainty bounds, durable storage accounting, and interoperable registries that make procurement and regulation credible.

The Stakes

Without trustworthy MRV, carbon dioxide removal investment stalls or misallocates. The world either underbuilds removal and misses climate targets, or overpays for low-integrity credits and loses social trust. MRV is the trust layer for a future carbon-negative industry.

Headline evidence

  • •DOE summarizes that IPCC Special Report pathways include scenarios where 3.5 to 16 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO₂) per year are removed in 2050 from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) plus direct air capture systems, highlighting scale and verification stakes. [1]
  • •DOE modeling indicates the U.S. may require roughly 0.5 to 2.4 billion tons of CO₂ per year of carbon dioxide removal by 2050 to reach net zero, depending on broader mitigation success. [1]
  • •DOE explicitly notes that the prevalence of certain modeled approaches is partly due to limited cost and performance information on the full range of carbon dioxide removal pathways, making robust measurement and validation a near-term necessity. [1]

Neglectedness

InevitableNeglected

Why it stays neglected

    MRV is public-good infrastructure. The buyer is multiple: corporates, regulators, insurers, and the public. Each wants different assurance levels. Meanwhile, projects want cheap MRV but markets need strict MRV. That tension stalls standardization.

Tractability

    This is tractable because the near-term work is engineering, not new physics: sensor fusion, statistical uncertainty, audit trails, and registry interoperability. The hard part is governance: designing standards that can evolve without breaking markets, and creating credible third-party verification.

Startup surfaces

  • •MRV toolchains that produce audit-ready evidence and uncertainty quantification
  • •Standards and registry interoperability layers with open APIs and provenance logs
  • •“Durability accounting” services for geological, mineral, and ocean storage pathways
  • •Continuous monitoring sensors and remote sensing pipelines for biological and land sinks
  • •Insurance and warranty markets priced off MRV quality and observed permanence
Source Stack (3)
  • [1] U.S. Department of Energy. Carbon Dioxide Removal: Purpose, Approaches, and Recommendations. (Jan 2025).
  • [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. AR6 Synthesis Report (Full Report). (2023).
  • [3] Congressional Research Service. Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Purpose, Approaches, and Context. (Nov 2024).

Builder Proof-of-Work

Community submitted artifacts, notes, and implementations for this idea.

One AGI-era startup idea, every week.

Deep, open-sourced theses with scores, forecasts and the case for why now. Free.