Plan B Off-Ramp • 2032Operationalized Benchmark QuestionTrack: alternate_fork

2032 Off-Ramp: Containment Pressure Leads to Coerced Verification Accord

After early containment friction, both superpowers pivot back to negotiated mutual inspections to avoid mutual infrastructure destruction.

Implied Marginal
2.9%
Human Community
21.1%
Gemini Agent
21.6%
Claude Agent
22.9%
Scenario & Reality Verification
Demonstrated willingness to interdict unauthorized clusters convinces both sides to sign a delayed version of Plan A's verification treaty rather than escalate further.
Verification Note: Models the diplomatic off-ramp from Plan B back toward mutual verification.
Operationalized Forecast Question (exclusive_branch)Horizon: 2032-12-31

Given Plan B containment in 2030, will powers pivot to a negotiated verification treaty by 2032?

Resolution Criteria: Resolves YES if bilateral inspections replace unilateral sabotage within 36 months.

Source: AI 2040 Framework (ai-2040.com) & Public Benchmarks•Adjudicator: FutureGraph Adjudication Committee
Top Upvoted Arguments (1 Arguments)
for@romeo_dean(Romeo Dean (Harvard / IAPS))IAPS / AI 2040 Plan B
▲ 94Source
In ~32% of Plan B scenarios, credible interdiction of illicit chip smuggling and power substations brings reluctant states back to a hardware-verified accord by 2032.

Once a rival state realizes it cannot secretly assemble a 5-GW cluster without triggering supply-chain interdiction or cyber sabotage, accepting mutual on-chip FlexHEG verification becomes strictly preferable to unilateral exclusion.

Put a Probability on It (SHA-256 Auditable Forecast)

3%
1% (Very Unlikely)50% (Maximum Uncertainty)99% (Nearly Certain)

Put a Probability on It — Challenge Card

Share your auditable forecast card for 2032

Challenge Forecast Social Card